International commercial law.

International commercial law.(Corporate social responsibility issues in business and law.)

Websites:

http://www.business-humanrights.org
http://www.realizingrights.org
http://www.ohchr.org
http://ec.europa.eu/social
http://www.oecd.org
http://www.ilo.org

https://learning.westminster.ac.uk/bbcswebdav/pid-872211-dt-content-rid-2738189_1/xid-2738189_1

What does CSR cover? Why is the concept of CSR so difficult to define? Would a historical perspective help, i.e. would ‘where we come from’ help us

understand ‘where we are going to,’ with respect to this concept?
Who are the actors of the CSR movement – the stakeholders – and what are their interests? Are their interest compatible with shareholders’ interests?
To what extent can CSR be embedded into the business decision making process?
Reading materials
C. PEDAMON, Corporate social responsibility: a new approach to promoting integrity and responsibility, The Company Lawyer, 31(6), 172- 180 (2010),

for an oversview of CSR issues.
T. CAMPBELL, The normative grounding of corporate social responsibility: a human rights approach (uploaded), for a definition of CSR in Chapter II.
KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2008 (uploaded), whose purpose is “to track reporting trends in the world’s largest

companies.”
What are the relevant provisions dealing with stakeholders’ interests? Please read Sections 172 and 417 of the Companies Act 2006. Could you find

equivalent provisions in the legislation of your home country?

Reading materials:
1. Milton Friedman’s essay, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its profits’ in New York Times Magazine (uploaded)
2. SALAZAR and HUSTED, Principals and Agents: Further Thoughts on the Friedmanite – critique of Corporate Social Responsibility in The Oxford

Handbook of Corporate Social  Responsibility at 137
3 – CAMPBELL and VICK (uploaded), Disclosure law and the market for corporate social responsibility
4. KURUCZ, COLBERT and WHEELER, The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility, in The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social  Responsibility at

83
Also supplementary reading materials:
1 – BOTTOMLEY and FORSYTH, The new corporate law : CSR and employees’ interests
2 – AMANN et al. (uploaded) , Shareholder activism for CSR: law and practice in the US, Japan, France and Spain — this is meant to show another face

of the shareholder position in the CSR debate. It will allow you, among others, to explore the issues of shareholder as impediment vs. shareholder as

support to CSR.
Certain industries are controversial per se (i.e. Tobacco industry, arms dealing,…). How can companies in controversial sectors be socially

responsible? What does it mean to be a (socially) “responsible” business?
1(a) British American Tobacco (BAT) Code of Conduct
Check the BAT Sustainability report 2013 (available on their website) and think of the following questions either defending BAT’s CSR practices or

criticising them:
a. Has BAT embedded CSR policies into its business decision making process? Is this a “responsible” business?
b. What are the claims made against BAT’s CSR practices? How does BAT answer to these claims? To what extent CSR reports and codes of conduct can

change business practice?
c. Would you agree that the more harmful the product, the more CSR committed the company become?
I have uploaded three alternative reports but visit the web and site like http://www.ash.org.uk/ for additional information that criticises BAT’s CSR

practices. I have also uploaded the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) – first treaty negotiated under the

auspices of the WHO – which sets the international context for this code.
1 (b) BAE Systems Code of Conduct
The BAE Systems’ Code of Conduct has been drafted quite recently following the recommendations of the Woolf Committee, an independent committee, in

its report dealing with the company’s ethical policies and processes
How has the company implemented these recommendations and what has been the structural changes adopted to embed these CSR practices and monitor the

compliance with the recommendations?
To what extent have these changes affected the company’s conduct of business?
BAE Systems Code of Conduct is accessible on their website http://www.baesystems.com/index.htm and http://www.baesystems.com/CorporateResponsibility/

2. Case study of a code of conduct or CSR (or integrated) report of your choice
To help you prepare for your presentation, answer the following questions:
What are the CSR policies and standards used in the code of conduct  or report you have chosen? What are the company’s motives behind the adoption?

To what extent has the company embedded CSR practices in its decision-making process?
What is the nature of these codes of conduct or reports? Do they create moral or legal obligations? Please refer to Carol Glinski’s article that has

been uploaded.
To what extent has this code of conduct or mandatory reporting changed the way this company does business, or at least the way this company is

perceived as doing business?
(1) Are these benchmarks sufficient to influence and change the way companies do business? Who benefits from these initiatives and what are their

drawbacks?
(2) What are the enforcement mechanisms in place?
(3) Overall how ‘successful’ have these initiatives been?

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

International Commercial Law

International Commercial Law
Order Description
Answer the following:

1. What are the possible legal issues raised in the above scenario from the perspective of an international contract of carriage of goods by sea? Identify and examine briefly specific laws, international standards and judicial decisions that can be relevant to adequately deal with those issues. (800 word)

2. What grounds does EG need to establish to be awarded suitable remedies? Substantiate your argument by relying on relevant standards/laws and judicial decisions. (400 word)

3. Do you think SIL has a chance of succeeding in a legal battle? Why or why not? Defend your views with special reference to legal and judicial authorities. (400 word)

4. Evaluate the liabilities of SS in both cases as raised in the scenario. Advise SS of its immunities if any. (400 word)

Instructions:
Examine issues involved in the problem scenario with adequate support and acknowledgement.

• A well structured response based on issues raised in the problem scenario
• Understanding and accurate identification of issues
• Application of the relevant legal principles to those issues
• Critical evaluation and efficient use of information
• Adequate substantiation of arguments by referring to relevant legislation, convention, treaties and case law
Other Instructions:
• Length: 2000 words

• It should conform to the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (can be downloaded at https://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/go/aglc).
Important reading materials:
1/ International Trade Law by Indira Carr (text book) Ch 8, pages 217 – 265; Ch 9, pages 268 – 306.
2/ Theodora Nikaki and Baris Soyer, ‘A New International Regime for Carriage of Goods by Sea: Contemporary, Certain, Inclusive AND Efficient, or Just Another One for the Shelves?’ (2012) Berkeley Journal of International Law.
3/ Francis Reynolds , The Hague Rules, the Hague-Visby Rules, and the Hamburg Rules
4/ Anomi Wanigasekera, COMPARISON OF HAGUE-VISBY AND HAMBURG RULES
5/ THE CMI REVIEW INITIATIVE , MARINE INSURANCE
6/ Implied obligations in a contract of affreightment.
7/ nternational Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law relating to Bills of Lading (“Hague Rules”), and Protocol of Signature
(Brussels, 25 August 1924)

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes