Login
August 8th, 2017 
admin Metaphysics
Paper instructions:
This is what the paper is about
SYNOPSIS: STAR TREK EPISODE
“The Measure of a Man” [1]
Most of us are aware that the television series Star Trek was about a starship, the Enterprise, whose mission was to explore the galaxy. This ship was part of a larger organization known as Starfleet. Serving as a Lt. Commander on board the ship was an android named Data. Data was an extremely advanced and unique android even by the standards of 24th century science. He had a special processor known as a “positronic brain” that allowed him to mimic human behavior in an extremely accurate manner. As a result, not only could he process information at lightning speed and arrive at rational conclusions, he also seemed to have desires, interests, and inclinations. He could formulate relationships and make free choices.
In this episode, Commander Bruce Maddox, a member of the scientific research division of Starfleet, arrives on board the Enterprise with orders for Data to be transferred to him for the purpose of being disassembled with the goal of learning more about “it” (Maddox refers to Data as “it”, not “him”, throughout the entire episode). His ultimate goal is to create an army of androids like Data which can serve the needs of Starfleet in space exploration. When Data learns that Maddox may not be able to reassemble him, he refuses to submit to the orders and is supported by Captain Picard, captain of the Enterprise and Data’s commanding officer. Picard argues that, as an officer on the Enterprise, Data has rights—among them the right to refuse to undergo an experimental procedure such as this. However, Picard is unsuccessful in getting the transfer orders rescinded and so Data resigns from Starfleet.
Maddox takes legal action with the local JAG (Judge Advocate General) officer challenging Data’s resignation and arguing that Data is not a person with a right to resign, but, being a machine, “it” is the property of Starfleet. He argues “Would you permit the computer of the Enterprise to refuse a refit?” going on to claim that Picard’s reaction is, “emotional and irrational. You are endowing Data with human characteristics because it looks human, but it is not. If it were a box on wheels I would not be facing this opposition.”
The JAG officer concurs with Maddox and rules that Data is the property of Starfleet and cannot resign or refuse to co-operate. Picard requests a hearing to challenge the ruling and is placed in the position of being the defending attorney for Data while his senior officer, Commander Riker, is given the unenviable job of prosecuting attorney.
Riker opens his case by having Data define android which Data defines as “an automaton made to resemble a human being.” Riker emphasizes “automaton” and “resembles.” After demonstrating Data’s abilities as a machine, Riker summarizes his argument:
The commander is a physical representation of a dream; an idea conceived of by the mind of a man. Its purpose: to serve human needs and interests. It’s a collection of neural nets and heuristic algorithms. It’s response dictated by elaborate software written by a man. It’s hardware built by a man. And now a man will shut it off.
With that Riker reaches behind Data and turns the switch that shuts him down say “Pinocchio is broken. His strings have been cut.”
During a recess in the proceedings, Picard consults with Guinan, a wise alien on board the Enterprise and becomes convinced that the real issue in this case is the creation of a race of Data’s to be enslaved to do man’s bidding. He believes this issue has been obscured “behind a comfortable, easy euphemism—property” and is determined to challenge that thinking.
In his opening defense Picard acknowledges that Data is a machine but comments that this is irrelevant, “We too are machines, just machines of a different type.” He also acknowledges that, as Data was created by a human, so are we, “Children are created from the building blocks of their parents DNA. Are they property?” He then asks Data a series of questions demonstrating that, like any person, he has wants and desires, values things, and forms deep personal relationships.
Picard then calls Maddox to the stand and asks for the definition of a sentient being. Maddox offers three criteria: “Intelligence, self-awareness and consciousness.” Picard goes on to ask Maddox to “prove to the court that I am sentient.” When Maddox claims that Picard’s sentience is obvious, Picard asks what the difference between himself and Data is. Maddox replies that Picard is self-aware (he acknowledges the first criteria of Data’s intelligence) and defines self-aware as “Conscious of your existence and actions. You are aware of yourself and your own ego.”
Picard turns to Data and asks him what he is currently doing. Data replies, “I am taking part in a legal hearing to determine my rights and status: am I a person or property.” When asked what is at stake, he replies, “My right to choose. Perhaps my very life.” Picard points out how often Data refers to himself in his reply, “My rights, my status, my right to choose, my life. He seems reasonably self-aware to me.” He then asks Maddox, “What if Data can fulfill the last criteria, consciousness, in even the smallest degree? What is he then? Do you know?” He asks the same question of Riker and the JAG officer and goes on to say, “Starfleet was founded to seek out new life, well there it sits.” Picard argues that if we create an army of Datas to do man’s bidding, then “Thousands of Datas become a race. Won’t we be judged by how we treat that race?”
After considering the arguments, the JAG officer makes her final ruling:
It sits there looking at me and I don’t know what it is. This case has dealt with metaphysics, with questions best left to saints and philosophers. I am neither competent nor qualified to answer those. But I’ve got to make a ruling to speak to the future. Is Data a machine? Yes. Is he the property of Starfleet? No. We have been dancing around the basic issue: Does Data have a soul? I don’t know that he has. I don’t know that I have. But I have got to give him the freedom to explore that question himself. It is the ruling of this court that Lt. Commander Data has the right to choose.
Data exercises his right to refuse to undergo the procedure encouraging Maddox to continue his research. Maddox agrees to rescind his request for transfer, commenting about Data that “He’s remarkable.”
This was a response to the above
In Picard’s opening line of defense, “ We too are machines, just of a different type,” he acknowledges that Data is a machine. He continues to acknowledge that Data was created and that humans are also created by the building blocks of their parents’ DNA. Picard continues with his line of questioning asking for a definition of sentience. Maddox replies with the criteria, “Intelligence, self awareness and consciousness,” which Picard seems to agree with as a reasonable definition.
I believe from the language that Picard uses, he demonstrates that he holds to a materialist view of metaphysics. In the opening line of Hasker his definition of the materialist view says;”Man is wholly a material being.” Hasker continues defining materialism by saying;” A human is his body, and the body is the person,” and “the human brain is a self operating computer.”(Hasker 70) Picard demonstrates his agreement with these ideas by stating that men are machines of a different type. He seems to be implying that man is nothing more than a “meat computer”(Hasker 70). He appears to be saying that Data being a machine of one type and men being machines of a different type are equal. Further it appears that Picard believes that intelligence, self awareness, whether real or simulated are the measure of a man.
Maddox, on the other hand, appears to hold to a dualist view of metaphysics. Maddox understands that Data is a machine and demonstrates that by powering Data down. In powering Data down, Maddox demonstrates that Data’s intelligence can be shut off. The mind cannot be turned off as it is not physical. The mind has no size, shape, mass or spatial location nor does it have an on/off switch (Hasker 66). Maddox goes even further still by defining sentience as intelligence, self awareness and consciousness. Maddox is defining the processes of the mind which are not artificial in man as they are in Data. These properties of the mind are natural to man whereas with Data he only mimics true intelligence.
To answer the second question, I do believe that along with intelligence, self awareness and consciousness there are other properties which a man must have to be considered a person. Man is made up of physical properties. Man is flesh, he has a brain, organs, skin, fingers, toes and other parts, which have size, shape, mass and spatial location. While not all people have the ability to reproduce, I believe that reproduction is also an aspect of our being people. Data was the invention of someone, he was put together with computer chips and parts. Contrary to the idea that Picard has put forth, people are not created by their parents. People are conceived by other people. Even if we were to say that conception occurred in a laboratory, we must also acknowledge that human eggs come from other humans as do sperm.
Another aspect of a human being is the presence of a human soul. While it is possible that other beings contain a soul, the human soul is unique. The soul or mind is the seat of reason and conscience. Human beings have an innate sense of what is right and what is wrong, they may suppress that sense of right and wrong, but it is present. Another aspect that comes with the soul is a desire to worship or ascribe worth to certain things or a particular Being.
In closing I do not find that the JAG officers ruling is correct. Life is life and artificial life is artificial. Data is the invention of a person; he is a machine and not a person, although a high level machine. He is a machine and non the less. He is the property of Starfleet and if Starfleet wishes to dismantle a machine for the purposes of science, so be it. A machine has no rights not even if it has the ability to make calculated decisions or mimic human behavior to any degree. I say tear it apart.
I need a reply of disagreement to this reply
ORDER THIS ESSAY HERE NOW AND GET A DISCOUNT !!!
Posted in Uncategorized