It is generally acknowledged that the number of international organizations has dramatically increased in the past century. IR scholars, however, disagree about the implications of this phenomenon.

Has this growing number of international organizations fundamentally changed the nature of international governance? If so, how? If not, why? Explain your answer using the weekly readings as your guide, and by referring to actual empirical examples.

Use only lesson readings login is 4682232 and password is Yamysem1987 my university website is www.amu.apus.edu. For IRLS502, week 2, lesson readings. Use at least one source from here. No outside sources!
Mearsheimer, John J.1994/1995.”The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tsh&AN=9502230705&site=ehost-live

Abbott, Kenneth W. and Duncan Snidal.1998.”Why States Act through Formal International Organizations,” Journal of Conflict Resolution http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/224562054?accountid=8289

Chorev, Nitsan.2005. “The Institutional Project of Neo-Liberal Globalism: The Case of the WTO.” 317-355. http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/821293332?accountid=8289

Thompson, Alexander. 2011.”Why did Bush Bypass the UN in 2003? Unilateralism, Multilateralism and Presidential Leadership.” http://politicalscience.osu.edu/faculty/athompson/Thompson_WhiteHouseStudies_Proofs.pdf

Finnemore, Martha. 1996. “The Culture of National Security — Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention,”http://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=http://www.ciaonet.org/book/katzenstein/katz05.html